Notice: Function _load_textdomain_just_in_time was called incorrectly. Translation loading for the acf domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /var/www/electricityrates/wordpress/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6121
Ohio utilities continue to protect themselves from retail providers - electricityrates.pt-site.com

The browser you are using is not supported. Please consider using a modern browser.

Skip Navigation
Start of main content.

Ohio utilities continue to protect themselves from retail providers

Author: Adam Cain | Updated:

Only months after American Electric Power’s long battle with the Public Utilities Commission of Ohio, another municipal utility is asking the state’s energy regulator to approve a charge that would protect from the growing competition from more retail energy providers.

According to the Columbus Dispatch, Dayton Power & Light, which serves customers throughout  Madison, Pickaway and Union counties, is asking to charge $120 million per year for the coming five years for a “service stability rider,” which would help the utility make the transition into a competition-based market.

The application, filed with PUCO on Friday, October 6, stated that DP&L’s “financial integrity will be threatened without such a charge.” If approved, the charge would result in a $5-per-household increase in electricity rates, however the filing noted that other parts of the electricity bill would actually decrease.

DP&L is following in the footsteps of AEP, which requested a similar $500 million “retail stability rider” in August that would help the utility bounce back from losses related to customers switching to retail energy providers to find the best electricity rates.

According to Crain’s Cleveland Business, AEP’s request was met with heavy resistance from retail providers like FirstEnergy, which claimed AEP was trying to hold onto its monopoly.